The Dot Com Miner

A Life Of Religion

Archived Posts from this Category

June 6, 2008

Crosses and Other Religious Symbols

Filed under: A Life Of Religion — @ 12:10 am

Many people use crosses and other religious symbols to demonstrate their beliefs. The use of the cross as a religious symbol predates Christianity by many years. Early religious crosses were found in Scandinavia, where they were symbols of the god Thor. In Babylon, a cross adorned with a crescent moon symbolized a moon god, while a sun god was represented by an Assyrian cross that demonstrated the four directions the sun shines by its corners. Both earthly and celestial states are shown in Hindu crosses.

The ankh is a cross topped with a loop that was used in early Egyptian religions. It was associated with Maat, the Egyptian goddess of truth. The ankh can be seen in jewelry today and is still a symbol displayed by many people.

Since ancient times in Europe, the representation of a human figure on a cross has been seen. This was originally a pagan symbol related to crop fertility, but was later seen in Christian crucifixes.

The first use of a cross in Christianity is believed to be on a mid-5th century Vatican sarcophagus. Today both plain religious crosses and crucifixes are symbols with great meaning to those with Christian beliefs as they represent the manner in which Jesus Christ died.

Crosses can be made of many different materials, including precious metals. They are often worn on chains around the neck as jewelry. They can also be displayed in the home in the form of wall plaques or statues. When you meet someone who is wearing or displaying a cross, you will know they treasure their Christianity.

Other Christian religious symbols

While the cross may be the most popular symbol of Christianity, there are other well-known Christian religious symbols. One that is often seen is the fish. Normally shown as a simple outline, it was originally a pagan symbol representing the Mother Goddess. Other ancient cultures, including the Chinese, the Egyptians, the Romans, the Scandinavians and the Greeks also used the fish to represent gods in their religions.

The fish symbol was acknowledged in Christianity by the requirement of eating fish on Friday, a practice that was ended fairly recently. This tradition may have arisen from the early Greek worship of the fish goddess, Aphrodite Salacia. Her followers ate fish on Friday, her sacred day. Another source of the former Christian fish eating practice may have been the Scandinavian goddess Freya. Her name is the source of the present day name for the sixth day of the week, Friday and fish was eaten in her honor.

Images of angels and saints are other significant Christian religious symbols. These symbols can be seen in paintings, sculptures and jewelry. Many people believe that angels and saints can have a positive influence on different aspects of their lives and may pray to them for assistance.

Jean Feingold is a copywriter for Catalogs.com. Catalogs.com is the Internet’s leading source for print and online catalog shopping - and a growing hub of original content and “how to” information at www.catalogs.com.

May 18, 2008

The Home of Forgotten Kings

Filed under: A Life Of Religion — @ 6:38 pm

2nd Samuel Chapters 11 - 19

All Scripture references taken from the “Good News Bible.”

King David may have been a man who passionately loved God, but his family life often was in shambles. A study of his life reveals that, among his children, there was immorality, fratricide, treason and even the rape of a brother against a sister.

The rebellious treason of David’s son, Absolom, against his father resulted in the temporary overthrow of David from his throne and his son declaring himself king of Israel. Fearing for his life at the hand of Absolom, the king fled Jerusalem, while the generals of his armies, the brothers, Joab and Abishai, led the troops still loyal to the king against Absolom and his rebels.

Absolom was an exceptionally handsome young man with very long hair. The battle went bad for the rebels and, as Absolom was fleeing astride a mule, his flowing hair caught in the branches of a tree. The mule sped on, leaving the young rebel helplessly hanging by his hair. One of David’s men saw what happened.

“Sir,” he reported to Joab, “I saw Absolom hanging in an oak tree.”

“Why didn’t you kill him on the spot? I would have given you ten pieces of silver and a belt.”

“Even if you gave me a thousand pieces of silver, I wouldn’t lift a finger against the king’s son. We all heard the king command you . . . ‘For my sake, don’t harm the young man, Absolom.’ But if I had disobeyed the king, and killed Absolom, the king would have heard about it . . . and you would not have defended me.”

Then ten of Joab’s men went and killed Absolom. Hearing of his son’s death, despite Joab’s protests, David mourned and wept for his son. He afterward sent a message to the chief priests in Jerusalem, asking, “Why should you be the last to help bring back the king to his palace? You are my relatives [brethren - KJV], my own flesh and blood; why should you be the last to bring me back?” (2nd Samuel 19:11-12)

According to the above Bible passages, David had fled Jerusalem to avoid being assassinated by his son Absolom, who coveted the throne. Crossing the Jordan River, David waited there until a report came of Absolom’s defeat. He dispatched a message to some of his subjects who had remained unharmed in Jerusalem. The message was directed to the leaders of the tribe of Judah - David’s own tribe - his own relatives, which in essence asked, “Why haven’t you expressed a desire for my return? Why haven’t you brought me back to be your king? I’m waiting for you to bring me back.”

There are some lukewarm believers who have permitted Absoloms to ascend to the thrones of their hearts. These Absoloms cause their hearts to rebel against Jesus Christ, He who is the rightful King. To such a believer, through the voice of the Holy Spirit, Christ asks, “When are you going to bring me back? I’m waiting to once again return as King of your heart and life. Are you going to be the last to bring me back?”

Yes, you are a Christian. Yes Jesus Christ is your Savior. Yes, you love Him. But you nonetheless are holding something back from Him. You have not made Him your King. So, is it any wonder that the voice of the Holy Spirit reminds you that Jesus Christ desires to be welcomed back as King? He’s waiting for you to dedicate yourself completely to Him.

Some time back, this writer read an unusually interesting article titled, “The Home of Forgotten Kings.” It explained how kings who had been overthrown fled to a certain place for refuge to await the possibility that they might one day be invited to return to power. To this end, their overriding concern was the political developments of their former kingdoms.

Jesus Christ also waits in the hope that those who spiritually have sent Him to The Home of Forgotten Kings, will soon call for Him to return. What will determine such a return is the spiritual condition of one’s heart.

The Old Testament records that, initially, God’s perfect plan for the nation of Israel was that He was to be their king, but instead Israel wanted a human king. “We want to be like other nations. Give us a king!” So God did so, but not before He warned them of the dire consequences of their choice. Just as God had warned, Israel experienced the distressing consequences. After winning a war against a determined enemy, Saul, Israel’s first king, disobeyed God’s command that all of the captured enemy booty was to be destroyed. Israel was to claim nothing of it for itself. Saul also disobeyed the order to not offer sacrifices himself, but to wait until the prophet Samuel came to do so. He was a headstrong king, who always attempted to excuse his sinful actions. Though there were several good kings in the history of Israel, many more were depraved apostates who took to worshiping pagan gods. They had sent God to The Home of Forgotten Kings, and ultimately were conquered by the very nations whose false idol gods they had adopted.

Webster’s definition of a king is: “A person who is a hereditary sovereign.” Such a person rules by right of birth. Jesus Christ, the heavenly Lord, is such a sovereign who rules by right of birth; He is a King by birthright.

There is a story of a seminary professor who shocked his students by declaring, “I’m in God’s second best will!”

He went on to explain that, when he was only a young preacher, God called him as a foreign missionary to a certain nation. But he had just received a good job and he rebelled against the call. Eventually, that particular nation closed its doors to more missionaries.

“I refused to go, and so now I’m in God’s second best will,” he sadly repeated.

What had happened to the professor? He had sent Christ to The Home of Forgotten Kings. He had forgotten that Jesus Christ was his King by birthright. The results may not always be so drastic, but to dethrone Christ from our hearts for even a short while is a dangerous thing to do.

John Wesley used to tell of how united his parents were an almost everything, until one day a division occurred in Britain. Some wanted Prince Charles to rule; others were in favor of the Prince of Orange. Wesley’s parents were on opposite sides of the issue. One day the senior Wesley was going to London on church business and he noticed his wife was not preparing to go with him.

“Why are you not preparing to travel to London with me?”

“Because I do not think Prince Charles should be king,” his wife replied.

Hearing this, her husband responded, “Then we cannot live together; we must sleep in different beds. If we have two kings, we must have two beds.” He left and did not return until Prince Charles was on the throne.

Drastic? Of course, but the John Wesley’s story reveals the intense loyalty some persons have to an earthly ruler. They are willing to leave home, family and friends out of loyalty to earthly rulers of their choice. This being so, how much more loyal should believers be to Christ, the Ruler of the eternal ages? Our king has not asked us leave our families without means of support, as the senior Wesley did with his. However, He has asked that we propagate His saving mission and soon return as King over all.

The former emperors of China and Japan had men who were their exact doubles. At banquets and social affairs, in order to protect their lords, these doubles would often take their places. To accomplish this duty, they underwent rigorous training to perfectly imitate the emperor. So honored did they consider themselves at being chosen for the potentially dangerous task, that the danger meant nothing to them. They would have gladly sacrificed their lives for their emperor.

Believers have a king whom they must imitate. As the Apostle Paul wrote, “Be imitators of me, as I am an imitator of Christ.” A hymnist has written: “King of my life I crown Thee now. Thine shall the glory be. Lest I forget Thy thorn crowned brow, lead me to Calvary.” [Hymn: Lead Me to Calvary, by Jennie Evelyn Hussy; 1874 - 1958: and William J. Kirkpatrict, 1838 - 1921].

Earthly kings are crowned with incredible pomp and pageant in a palace or a cathedral. Our king is crowned as King of our lives at the foot of the cross - at Calvary. His hands are nail scarred, as are His feet. His side is spear-gashed and His brow imprinted where thorns pressed His head. Such is the crucified and risen King we take as our own at the foot of the cross.

Some time ago, a navy ship was sailing the high seas, when it received an S.O.S call from a sinking ship. Speeding to the distressed ship, the navy ship found men floundering in the ocean. Assuming command of a section of the rescue team, the chaplain ordered, “Throw everything that will float overboard to these men!”

His men did so, and one sailor tossed overboard the chaplain’s portable wooden altar that had a cross attached to its top. As it floated with the cross clearly visible above the waves, the sailor shouted to the floundering men, “Cling to the cross! Cling to the cross and be saved!”

Yes, that is the call to all who have not sent for the King of kings to return to their hearts from the home of forgotten kings.

Cling to the cross; Cling to the cross and be saved!
-30-

© Josprel (Joseph Perrello)
Josprel@verizon.net

April 15, 2008

The Story of One Soul…So Far…

Filed under: A Life Of Religion — @ 11:59 pm

The Story of One Soul…So Far… Author Interview with Matthew
Lickona, Swimming With Scapulars: True Confessions Of A Young
Catholic by Lisa M. Hendey

O.K., I’ll admit it…he had me with title. Before I even cracked
the cover of Matthew Lickona’s new book Swimming With Scapulars:
True Confessions Of A Young Catholic (Loyola Press, April 2005,
hardcover, 278 pages), I found myself intrigued. Gratefully,
having now read and re-read the book in its entirety, I’ll say I
was not disappointed. As a matter of fact, this book is among my
favorites for the year - not because I agree 100% with
everything Lickona writes in this memoir, but because of his
stunningly gifted delivery and the honesty with which he shares
his soul.

Swimming With Scapulars is the story of one young man’s journey
of faith. The faith involved happens to be Catholicism, but the
appeal of this book is not found in its theology, but rather in
the glimpse it gives us into the development of spirituality in
this young man. Lest you think that Matthew is out to paint
himself a saint, he’s not - he shares his shortcomings, the
temptations he faces, and his sins with a forthrightness that
leaves you feeling like you really know him by the book’s end.
Many of my favorite passages in the book deal with Matthew’s
relationships with family - his parents, his brother, and now
his wife and children. Treat yourself to the experience of
reading Swimming With Scapulars - you will find yourself
entertained, enlightened, and perhaps even inspired to examine
the development of your own “soul story”.

Matthew Lickona shared the following on publishing his first
book, family, and his take on the future of the Church.

Q: Matthew, I know that you’ve been writing professionally since
1995, but what prompted you to write this book and has it met
your intended goals?

A: To some extent, I was carried along, so much so that a person
might be tempted to call it providence. My boss at the San Diego
Reader, Jim Holman, also publishes four Catholic newspapers,
among them the San Diego News Notes. The book began when he
asked me to write a column for the News Notes about my spiritual
life. I wasn’t sure how much I’d have to offer - I’m hardly a
spiritual giant - but I started digging around my interior and
writing about what I found there. I was also allowed to comment
on my experience of religion, the Church and the culture at
large, from books to Satan to Mass to movies. After about five
years, my wife Deirdre (among others) started urging me to
consider making a book out of columns. Eventually, I came around
to the idea; I thought the columns provided an interesting
portrait of a member of an interesting subculture: the young
Catholic struggling to embrace the faith in its fullness. After
Loyola Press bought the book, I reworked it into something of a
memoir - the story of my soul so far. As far as goals, I’d like
to see the book give pleasure and find a wide audience, of
course, and maybe spark some interest in and conversation about
the faith as I’ve experienced it.

Q: How would you describe Swimming with Scapulars to someone who
hasn’t yet read it? Who is your intended audience?

A: I would describe the book as the story of a young man’s
gradual immersion in the Catholic faith. There’s no slam-bang
moment of conversion or repentance, but there is a growing
understanding, acceptance, and even love of the mysteries, the
richness, and the demands of that faith. Along the way, I try to
give an honest account of my interior life, to show that the
Church is full of sinners (me), even as those sinners try to
advance in holiness. And I think I give some idea of how the
world looks through my eyes. I don’t know if I have an intended
audience; I’d like to see it read by believers and unbelievers,
Catholics and non-Catholics, Catholics who agreed with me and
those who don’t. I suppose I’d especially like to see younger
people read it and get a sense that living the faith is
possible, even in the midst of failure and sin. And more than
possible - worthwhile, supremely so.

Q: In the book, you eloquently describe the influence of your
parents and your brother, Mark on your own faith formation. What
important lessons have you learned from your parents and from
Mark about living the Faith?

A: This is an enormous question; I’ll just take a few things
from the top of my head. From my parents, certainly the absolute
necessity and primacy of prayer. They both start each day with
it, and it makes a tremendous difference. From my father, the
importance of witnessing in the face of hostility and turning
the other cheek. He fights the good fight at work - he’s a
professor at a state university - and in the Church, but he does
not give in to acrimony. Often, he is silent in the face of
criticism, even when it gets outrageous. From my mother, the
importance of acceptance. My brother was more of a model to me
of how a young Christian lived and thought, deeply in the world
but not so deep as to lose perspective.

Q: As a father yourself, how do you strive to share your faith
with your own children? What do you hope for the future of the
Church they will grow up in?

A: I think that for children, an important part of faith
formation is the establishment of habits. The habit of attending
Sunday Mass. The habit of prayer before meals and bedtime. When
they get old enough, the habit of confession and reception of
the Eucharist. Habits carry you when the will is weak, and they
are most easily established in youth, I think. That’s the
groundwork. On top of that, there is answering the barrage of
questions that children have, and even some preaching. It’s
taken years, but I’ve finally started to convince my eldest that
things won’t ever satisfy him. I try to make conversation about
religious matters an ordinary, everyday event; that’s how it was
for me when I was growing up. That way, I’m hoping, the faith
will start to work its way into everyday corners of their souls,
and not be reserved for “religious occasions.” And because I am
an authority, I model God for them in some way, so it’s crucial
that I teach by example. It’s harder to imagine them believing
in a loving God if they don’t have a loving father on earth.
They learn about love from the way I treat them, and from the
way I relate to my wife. What do I hope for the future of the
Church? That it will more perfectly carry out its mission to
bring souls to Christ, and that it will be a vibrant Church,
fully engaged with the world and sure of its own foundations.

Q: Tell us a bit about your time at Thomas Aquinas College and
how you met Dierdre. I know that you contemplated a vocation to
the priesthood - have you ever regretted not following that
path? What have you learned from your wife about the vocation to
Catholic family life and parenthood?

A: Thomas Aquinas College was where the I started to discover
the richness of the faith: its intellectual tradition (we read a
great deal of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas), its
devotional tradition (Eucharistic Adoration, the scapular,
prayer to the saints, etc.), and its doctrinal tradition. I
didn’t make it an explicit goal, but while I was there, I began
to reconnect with the tradition of the Church, to see it as a
guide and an inheritance. It’s worth noting that while TAC is a
Catholic college, and believes that the fullness of truth is
found in the Catholic Church, the Church does not enter
classroom discussion. It’s not a theological college; it’s a
liberal arts college. We read the Great Books of the Western
canon and we discuss them. You can’t shoot down the empiricists
by saying that the Church teaches otherwise. Outside of class,
in the general culture of the school, is where I made all these
discoveries about the faith. It wasn’t perfect; there was sin
there like anywhere else. But I loved it; it was a sort of
four-year retreat from the world for the sake of intellectual
formation. I should have been a better student, but I still
reaped many benefits.

I met Deirdre soon after arriving at the school. Though she was
older, we were both freshmen; everybody starts as a freshman at
the college and progresses through the same program. Each year
builds on what came before. When we met, she was dating a friend
of mine whose - but I knew his heart belonged to someone else.

We both worked on campus the following summer, and became great
friends. She had such a wit, but she didn’t use it as a shield;
she was comfortable with sincerity, the intimacy of genuine
friendship I think that’s also when I discovered what a
fantastic cook she was. I ate many dinners on the porch of her
dorm - no boys were allowed inside - and I was astonished at
what she could turn out with little more than a hotplate and a
microwave. And she drank bourbon. We fell in love about halfway
through Junior year. By then, all thoughts of the priesthood had
vanished. In fact, they vanished soon after I arrived at the
college. I think maybe some of my initial leanings were due to
my situation in high school. There, I was the odd man out - the
celibate, the guy willing to argue against abortion, the guy who
was serious about his Catholicism. Not to say I was alone in
this, but it certainly wasn’t the norm. Perhaps some of my
leanings toward the priesthood came from feeling of haven taken
a somewhat different path than many of my peers. At college, I
was just another Catholic. The attention I paid to religion
wasn’t something that set me apart. I’ve never regretted not
pursuing a priestly vocation. Sometimes, I feel a little guilty
- we need priests so badly, and here I am, happily married,
enjoying all sorts of natural blessings. But it’s not like
signing up for the military, where you can go if you think
you’re needed. You have to be called.

I’ve learned a great deal from my wife. She’s far more selfless
than I am, and she works a lot harder. Yet she complains less.
She is deeply devoted to my happiness and the happiness of our
children. I don’t think I’m a total flop as a spouse, but she is
to me a model of self-emptying love. Our marriage has been a
happy one, and I like to think I’ve grown as the job of being
husband and father demanded it. You start to get used to giving
over, you develop a feeling of never having done enough.
Hopefully, it inspires you to try a little harder. Christian
marriage is a vocation; it’s not simply what people do. It’s our
particular path to heaven, our best means of learning to love.

Q: You really lay your soul open in this book…how have you
dealt with readers’ reactions to the book, including those
closest to you and some who may be critical of your work?

A: Actually, reader response has been mostly positive, some of
it amazingly so. I like to think that has something to do with
the degree of honesty in the book, which is something I sought
after. I didn’t want a memoir that sailed off into happy
platitudes or airy abstractions. I wanted something grounded in
experience, and that will mean, among other things, sin. I tried
to make it clear that I wasn’t holier-than-thou, just interested
in being holier than I am. Those closest to me have been very
kind. There was one person who really hammered the book, first
on Amy Welborn’s blog and then on Amazon.com, and that did get
me upset, because I didn’t think she read the book carefully.
But my father has always said “it is a luxury to be understood.”
I’ve tried not to get upset. I posted a response on the blog,
but I mainly tried to correct the record, not argue with her
impressions.

Q: This year has been an historic one for our Catholic Church.
As a young Catholic, how have you responded to the passing of
Pope John Paul II and to the election of Pope Benedict XVI? What
role will your generation play in the Church of the new
millennium?

A: I’m almost 32; that puts me on the older edge of what people
are calling Generation John Paul II. He is the only pope I can
remember having prior to Benedict XVI, and I had (have) great
reverence and admiration for him. But I was not a disciple, not
the way, say, my sister-in-law Lisa was (is). I didn’t read the
encyclicals. I didn’t attend World Youth Day. I didn’t get
involved in discussions of his philosophy. My loyalty was to the
Church - which is not to say that I thought the Pope was somehow
opposed to that. I just didn’t focus on him, for good or ill.
Nor have I read much of what Benedict wrote when he was still
Cardinal Ratzinger, though I hope to at least partially remedy
that. From what I have seen so far, I like him very much.

As for what role my generation will play, please don’t make me
say that “I believe the children are our future.” Instead, let
me quote from my father’s book Character Matters, in which he
quotes Abraham Lincoln. “A child is a person who is going to
carry on what you have started. He is going to sit where you are
sitting, and, when you are gone, attend to those things which
you think are important…He is going to move in and take over
your churches…The fate of humanity is in his hands.”

I think it’s safe to say that the Church, at least in this
country, has been going through a rough patch of late. If the
“New Faithful” find what they’re looking for - and I hope they
will - then I think it bodes well for the Church. We’re short on
priests; a faith worth dying for is a faith worth giving up the
blessings of married life for. We need to re-evangelize the
West; a faith worth living for is a faith worth telling somebody
about, and actually living for it will be a powerful first step
in evangelization. I don’t want to get all pie-in-the-sky; I
don’t imagine that all the Church’s problems are about to
vanish. But I think the “New Faithful,” sound a hopeful note.

For more information on Swimming With Scapulars: True
Confessions Of A Young Catholic visit
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/082942072X/catholicmomcom

Lisa M. Hendey is a mother of two sons, webmaster of numerous
web sites, including http://www.catholicmom.com and
http://www.christiancoloring.com, and an avid reader of Catholic
literature. Visit her at http://www.lisahendey.com for more
information.

April 3, 2008

Vegetarianism

Filed under: A Life Of Religion — @ 10:26 am

Millions worldwide suffer from malnutrition and the threat of starvation. One-third of the grain in the world is being used to feed to animals to fatten up for slaughter. The amount of grain fed to animals being raised for slaughter is higher in the United States than other parts of the world. We could feed straving humans this grain instead of fattening up a cow for a fast food restaurant to make a hamburger. A vegetarian diet reduces the risk of heart disease and cancer. It makes weight loss easier and lowers cholesterol. Animals are given hormones and antibiotics, both of which humans can do without in excessive amounts. An added benefit to being a vegetarian is that we do not have to worry about mad cow disease or salmonella poisoning. Rainforests are being destroyed at a rapid rate to make room for cattle to graze. There is a lot of cruelty and abuse present when animals are being raised for slaughter.

Vegetarianism shows a respect for all of life or creation. The following quotes are from the Bible. If you believe the Bible is God’s word, then it appears that he did not have factory farming in mind:

A righteous man has a regard for the life of his beast.

Proverbs 12:10

The Lord is good to all, and his compassion is over all he has made.

Psalm 145:9

The reason I brought this up has nothing at all do with trying to convince others to become vegetarians. It appears to be another way only parts of the Bible are followed. More pick and choose religion. Christianity at its finest. Who wants to give up a good steak but cannot miss Sunday services? Hypocritical, again. It is inconvenient to not eat meat, it tastes good. Issacc Bashevis Singer said, “We are all God’s creatures…we pray to God for mercy and justice while we continue to eat the flesh of animals that are slaughtered on our account is not consistent.” Jesus spread a message of compassion, love and mercy. He said, “Blessed are the merciful.”

I honestly do not care whether other people eat meat or not. However, it does bother me when I hear how moral and righteous some Christians feel they are, and then they take the the path of least resistance. It is easier to just go with the flow and eat meat than to not eat it. I personally just decided to not have an animal killed for the sole purpose of me eating it. That choice has nothing to do with the Bible. I cook meat every night for my husband and son; that is their choice to eat it, not mine. It does not bother me at all to cook meat or that they eat it. Although, touching the dead flesh does give me the creeps.

Jackie Wellman, author of Spiritual Clarity, http://www.hoppy.bravehost.com, http://spiritualclarity.blogspot.com